Page tree

Previous Stable Release

Please note that the V3 release branch is now the previous stable release, with the current stable releases from the V4 branch.
Support for V3 will end on Dec 31, 2020.

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

File(s): conf/relying-party.xml

Format: Native Spring / Deprecated Custom Schema

Legacy V2 File(s): conf/relying-party.xml


The Shibboleth.SSO profile configuration bean enables support for the SAML 1.1 Browser Single Sign-On profile initiated via the legacy Shibboleth request protocol, which is documented in the UnsolicitedSSOConfiguration page.


The most typical options used are described in more detail below, but not every obscure option is discussed. See the javadoc for all of the possible configuration options for this profile (note that many of them are inherited from parent classes).

Virtually all the configuration options below can be set via two different properties: a static property that explicitly sets the value to use and a lookup strategy or predicate property that takes a Function or Predicate and returns the value to use. The dynamic property is generally named "propertyNamePredicate" or "propertyNameLookupStrategy" for Boolean- and non-Boolean-valued properties respectively.

The examples shown are not specific to any particular profile configuration.


Options common to most/all profiles:

securityConfiguration   SecurityConfigurationBean named shibboleth.DefaultSecurityConfigurationAn object containing all of the default security-related objects needed for peer authentication and encryption. See SecurityConfiguration for complete details.
disallowedFeatures 3.3Integer0A bitmask of features to disallow, the mask values being specific to individual profiles


Modifying the security configuration is usually done to:

  • specify an alternate signing or decryption key to use
  • control signing or encryption algorithms (but for metadata you control, it's advisable to control algorithms by using an extension to specify supported algorithms).


Options common to profiles that perform authentication:

Ordered list of profile interceptor flows to run after successful authentication
Ordered list of Java Principals to be used to select appropriate login flow(s) to attempt, in the event that a relying party does not signal a preference. See AuthenticationFlowSelection.
Ordered list of NameID Format(s) to select for use, in the event that a relying party does not signal a preference. This is nominally SAML-specific but may be adapted for use with other supported protocols as circumstances warrant.
forceAuthn 3.4BooleanfalseDisallows use (or reuse) of authentication results and login flows that don't provide a real-time proof of user presence in the login process


The postAuthenticationFlows property is used to apply special processing to requests, such as attribute release consent, password expiration warnings, authorization checks, or other custom processing.

Examples of postAuthenticationFlows property
<bean id="shibboleth.DefaultRelyingParty" parent="RelyingParty">

	<!-- Add consent to Shibboleth SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="Shibboleth.SSO" p:postAuthenticationFlows="attribute-release" />

	<!-- Add consent, followed by expiring password check, to SAML 2 SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="SAML2.SSO" p:postAuthenticationFlows="#{{'attribute-release', 'expiring-password'}}" />

	<!-- Return interceptors from a function bean (not shown). -->
	<bean parent="Shibboleth.SSO" p:postAuthenticationFlowsLookupStrategy-ref="InterceptorsFunction" />


With the increased use of multi-factor authentication, it is more common to find RPs that can specify authentication requirements, but there are still many cases, particular with commercial services, in which it becomes necessary to force the use of specific login methods. This can be achieved using the defaultAuthenticationMethods property by specifying one or more corresponding Principals to trigger the use of stronger methods.

Note that you must also prevent a malicious actor from overriding this preference for a SAML 2.0 SP by manufacturing a request, via one of two means:

  • For a SAML 2.0 SP that can sign its requests, its metadata can be modified with the AuthnRequestsSigned flag to indicate that its requests must be signed.
  • Alternatively, the disallowedFeatures property may be set with the SAML2.SSO.FEATURE_AUTHNCONTEXT bean to block use of the SAML 2.0 <RequestedAuthnContext> feature.

At present, no other authentication profiles support a feature capable of requesting the authentication method.

Examples of defaultAuthenticationMethods property
<!-- NOTE: these constants are examples and are not suitable for real use. -->
<bean id="MFASAML2Principal" parent="shibboleth.SAML2AuthnContextClassRef"
	c:_0="" />
<bean id="MFASAML1Principal" parent="shibboleth.SAML1AuthenticationMethod"
	c:_0="" />

<bean id="shibboleth.DefaultRelyingParty" parent="RelyingParty">

	<!-- Require MFA with Shibboleth SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="Shibboleth.SSO">
		<property name="defaultAuthenticationMethods">
				<ref bean="MFASAML1Principal" />

	<!-- Require MFA with SAML 2 SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="SAML2.SSO" p:disallowedFeatures-ref="SAML2.SSO.FEATURE_AUTHNCONTEXT">
		<property name="defaultAuthenticationMethods">
				<ref bean="MFASAML2Principal" />


The nameIDFormatPrecedence property is a common way of controlling the type of SAML NameIdentifier / NameID included in a response, a common requirement of many commercial services. It is in fact the only way to force the use of the ill-advised "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified" Format, which it must be noted is very rarely needed, despite frequent mis-documentation to the contrary.

In most cases, it is better to control the Format selected by including a <NameIDFormat> element in the SP's metadata. In the event that you don't control the metadata, you can inject the required element by applying a metadata filter.

Examples of nameIDFormatPrecedence property
<bean id="shibboleth.DefaultRelyingParty" parent="RelyingParty">

	Both constants below evaluate to the string "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified",
	and are interchangeable, they're just illustrations of different ways to reference the same string.

	<!-- Use "unspecified" NameIdentifier with Shibboleth SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="Shibboleth.SSO">
		<property name="nameIDFormatPrecedence">
				<util:constant static-field="org.opensaml.saml.saml1.core.NameIdentifier.UNSPECIFIED" />

	<!-- Use "unspecified" NameID with SAML 2 SSO profile. -->
	<bean parent="SAML2.SSO">
		<property name="nameIDFormatPrecedence">
				<util:constant static-field="org.opensaml.saml.saml2.core.NameIDType.UNSPECIFIED" />

	<!-- Return formats from a function bean (not shown). -->
	<bean parent="Shibboleth.SSO" p:nameIDFormatPrecedenceLookupStrategy-ref="FormatsFunction" />



Options common to SAML profiles:

Additional values to populate into audience restriction condition of assertions
includeConditionsNotBeforeBooleantrueWhether to include a NotBefore attribute in assertions
assertionLifetimeDurationPT5MLifetime of assertions
signAssertionsPredicate<ProfileRequestContext>falseWhether to sign assertions
signResponsesPredicate<ProfileRequestContext>varies by profileWhether to sign responses
signRequestsPredicate<ProfileRequestContext>falseWhether to sign requests


It isn't too common to need any of these options, and they should be changed only with care.

The additionalAudiencesForAssertion and includeConditionsNotBefore settings provide ways to work around bugs in other systems. You should never use these settings without obtaining a commitment from the other system's owner to fix their bugs.

The assertionLifetime setting does not involve control over the session with the relying party, it's only relevant in delegation scenarios.

The signing options have a complex history, which is one reason they are not themselves just boolean-valued. We provide Spring support so you can just set them to "true" or false" as though they are, but they also directly support the more dynamic approach of deriving the value with a bean.

The signResponses default varies by profile, see the notes on the individual profile pages.

If you need to enable the signAssertions option, and you control the SP's metadata, you should generally add the WantAssertionsSigned flag to it in place of using this option.


Options common to SAML profiles that may transmit messages via SAML Artifact (a pass by reference instead of value, followed by a callback).

artifactConfigurationSAMLArtifactConfigurationBean named shibboleth.DefaultArtifactConfigurationCustomizes the use of SAML artifacts


You shouldn't really need to modify this, as artifacts are rarely used anymore, and if they are, the default configuration suffices. The main reason you might change it is to switch a SAML 1.1 SSO configuration from Type 1 to Type 2 artifacts, but that's very obscure. If it ever comes up, we will provide an example.

With SAML 2.0, there is a valid case for customizing the configuration on a per-node basis by exposing dedicated resolution endpoints on each node, and making sure a node issues artifacts that will be resolved by that node. This is already exposed for you via the idp.artifact.endpointIndex property.


Options specific to the Shibboleth / SAML 1.1 SSO profile:

includeAttributeStatementBooleanfalseWhether to "push" attributes during SSO


The historical default for the Shibboleth profile of SAML 1.1 was to issue only authentication information through the normal channel and rely on a back-chanel to query for attributes, due to the lack of support for XML Encryption in SAML 1.1.

This a very commonly modified setting because of the gradual deprecation of the use of the back channel and support for attribute queries. With the very limited use of SAML 1.1, it's usually simpler to forgo supporting queries and simply push attributes for the few legacy systems left, relying on the TLS protections between the client and servers to protect the user's data from passive observation.

Note that the value of this setting is ignored when SAML artifacts are used, it's always true in those cases because the data is passed over a back-channel anyway.


The default value of signResponses for this profile is "true", and it is unsafe to change this value. If you encounter a relying party that accepts an unsigned response that is transmitted via POST (and not artifact), you have identified an insecure implementation and should report the issue immediately while following your local security incident response process.

  • No labels